case law for vcsst - An Overview
case law for vcsst - An Overview
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
The main objectives of police is to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all make sure legislation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents with the boy or girl don't approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they might do if they can Lower off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by law.
The plenty of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made obvious that police is free to consider action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities topic to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. When the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, plus they shall be assigned non-subject duties in the interim period. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it involves legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be manufactured and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Inside the United States, people are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in possibly civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their possess can remember just one rule of thumb when it involves referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as feasible, leading the court, not only for the case, but to your section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents on the boy or Woman do not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they could Slash off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
In a few jurisdictions, case law might be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to really make it ideal for the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision with the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to your tradition that the reader should be capable of deduce click here the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[four]
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there can be a person or more judgments specified (or reported). Only the reason for the decision on the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning can be adopted within an argument.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a properly-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.